Home
Benefits
News
entertainment
shop
finance
careers
education
join military
community
  
 

Allan Topol: A Time Out for Israel and the Palestinians
Allan Topol: A Time Out for Israel and the Palestinians

 

About Allan Topol


Allan Topol is a partner in a large Washington-based international law firm. He has a science and engineering degree from Carnegie Mellon, and a law degree from Yale University. For almost 40 years, he has been involved in issues at the height of the Washington power structure.

He is also a national bestselling novelist, using the thriller genre to explore international geopolitical and military issues. His new novel, ENEMY OF MY ENEMY, dealing with an American pilot shot down over Eastern Turkey and Russian nuclear weapons, was released February 1, 2005.

His 2001 novel, SPY DANCE, is about a former CIA agent on the run and Saudi Arabian oil. His 2003 novel, DARK AMBITION, deals with the corruption of power in Washington and China's threatening posture toward Taiwan. In January 2004, his new novel CONSPIRACY was released dealing with a foreign leader's attempt to influence an American presidential election and the possibility of renewed militarism in Japan.

Allan Topol contact info:
Allan Topol Website
Email Allan Topol

Allan Topol Books:
Spy Dance
Dark Ambition
Conspiracy

Allan Topol Archives


Military Opinions Index

Discussion Board
Have an opinion on this article? Sound off.


Your Two Cents

Submit your stories, news items, or a benefits update -- and help Military.com bring the best, most important stories to your fellow servicemembers, veterans, and family members. Contribute here

August 24, 2005

[Have an opinion about the issues discussed in this column? Sound off here.]

The Israelis have just concluded the evacuation of all the Jewish settlers from Gaza. The process for the Israeli government was inordinately difficult, as all of us who watched the wrenching scenes of people being removed from their homes observed. The Israeli soldiers and police force handled this difficult task with great sensitivity and professionalism.

The initiative for the Gaza withdrawal came from Prime Minister Sharon, and it was a remarkable exercise in statesmanship. This was an independent decision made by the Israeli government necessary for the future of Israel, for its defense line, for its economy, and for its relations with the United States. The evacuation went far faster and smoother than anyone expected. This was due in large part to the very careful and precise preparations by the Israeli military and police who were prepared for every contingency. Although there were some acts of violence aimed at Israeli soldiers by settlers, on the whole, the process demonstrated an acceptance by the Israeli populous, including the vast majority of the settlers of the rule of law.

Now that this Gaza withdrawal has been completed, the question is what happens next with respect to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? There are some who have argued in the Washington Post and elsewhere that since Israel has taken this first step toward making peace and reaching an accommodation with the Palestinians, it is now up to the United States to immediately lean hard on Israel and Sharon to make further withdrawals from all the West Bank, and to push hard on the roadmap for peace issued by President Bush. These commentators are absolutely wrong by 180 degrees. It would be totally counterproductive for the United States or anyone else for that matter to demand immediate next steps. Rather, what is urgently required is a time out which will benefit both sides and ultimately advance the peace process.

On the Israeli side, there must be time to absorb this very significant development, reflect upon it as a nation, and decide what further steps make sense. Prime Minister Sharon faces a difficult political situation with the resignation of his rival Benjamin Netanyahu, and he faces the prospect of new elections in an unsettled political landscape. By advocating and forcing the Gaza withdrawal through by the sheer strength of his personality, Sharon may have lost majority support in his right wing Likud party. He may end up forming a new party closer to the center, and if that party prevails in the next election, Sharon's ability to make peace will be further strengthened.

On the Palestinian side, there is now a new reality and the possibility of peace and statehood. However, the Palestinians must have leadership with the courage to build on the Israeli withdrawal and not to permit this major step toward a potential peace turn into another devastating downward spiral toward violence. Again, letting time pass is absolutely necessary.

The Palestinians need this time and the foreign assistance which has been promised to make an economic success out of Gaza. They have to build more homes, strengthen the economy of Gaza, create more jobs and let their people believe that there will be a safer, more prosperous future.



First and foremost, this means that Abbas must reign in the terrorists within the Palestinian community from Hamas and other organizations. The time has passed for vague indefinite promises now that Israel has withdrawn from Gaza. Abbas must act to disarm the terrorists in the Palestinian community and to redeem his pledge that the Palestinians will be one people under a single government.

It is significant that there was no violence from the Palestinian side during Israel's Gaza withdrawal. What this means is that either Abbas has found a way to control the terrorists, or Hamas leaders decided that violence against the Israelis was not in their own interest. Likewise, the wild and chaotic scenes of Palestinians shooting guns into the air and asserting that the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza constituted a victory for them and a victory for terrorism, did not occur. This indicates that control over the extreme elements in the Palestinian society can be exercised when the leaders decide that they want to do so. Now is the time to ensure that that control is solidified.

Any coercive steps taken by the United States at this point would serve to hurt the peace process. There is a time to act and a time to pause and take stock. The latter is what should happen in the Israeli Palestinian dispute. Preliminary indications are that that President Bush and Condoleezza Rice wisely agree with this conclusion.

Email this page to friendsRSS feed

© 2005 Allan Topol. All opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of Military.com.


 



 



Military Opinions Index


Member Center


FREE Newsletter


Military Report


Equipment Guides


Installation Guides


Military History