Home
Benefits
News
entertainment
shop
finance
careers
education
join military
community
  
 

Larry Scott: Steve Buyer’s One-Cheek Sneak
Larry Scott: Steve Buyer’s One-Cheek Sneak
 

About the Author

Larry Scott (former E-5) served four-plus years in the U.S. Army with overseas tours as a Broadcast Journalist at AFKN HQ, Seoul, Korea and AFN Lajes Field, The Azores, Portugal and a stateside tour as a Broadcast Journalism Instructor at the Defense Information School (DINFOS). Larry was decorated four times including the Joint Service Commendation Medal with Oak Leaf Cluster. He was awarded DOD's First Place Thomas Jefferson Award for Excellence in Journalism. After the Army, Larry went back to radio news, working in Indianapolis as a News Anchor on WIFE Radio and then in New York City as a News Anchor on WNBC Radio. He receives VA compensation for a service-connected disability and uses the Portland, Oregon/Vancouver, Washington VA facilities for healthcare. Today, Larry resides in Southwest Washington and operates the veteran's help website YourVABenefits.org. To contact Larry Scott email larry@yourvabenefits.org.

Larry Scott Archives


Related Links

Veterans Health Care Overview

Veteran Health Care Index


Military Legislative CenterLet Your Voice Be Heard!
Do you agree with the actions of your representatives? Let them know how you feel -- your voice matters! Visit our Legislative Center for the latest action alerts or contact your representatives NOW!
Dismantling vets' benefits and making it sound good

April 25, 2005

[Have an opinion on this article? Go to the Discussion Forum to sound off.]

In journalism we call it a “one-cheek sneak” -- the late Friday afternoon press release. The media is tucking in for the weekend and, most likely, the bad news in the press release will get overlooked. By Monday morning, when most people tune back in to the news, the bad news from Friday will not be news anymore. And, the “one cheek sneak” will have slipped by unnoticed -- hopefully.

Late Friday, April 22, 2005, I received such a press release via email. It was from the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs. The heading on the press release sure sounded good: Chairman Steve Buyer on Caring for Veterans: “A sacred duty.”

Words like “sacred” always get my attention because only ministers use the word “sacred” and really mean it. Politicians use “sacred” when they are trying to disguise their actions. Just so with this press release.

Rep. Steve Buyer (R-IN), Chairman of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, sure has a good Public Relations person. They really know how to write a tear-jerking press release. Filled with phrases like “sacred duty,” “highest priority,” “quality healthcare,” “Greatest Generation,” and “America has kept faith with its veterans,” this press release ranks right up there with the greatest works in American literature. Unfortunately the category of literature is FICTION.

Like all good fiction, this press release has some elements of truth -- like the date. And the fact that it came from Rep. Buyer's office.

Let's take a look at some of the fiction in this press release.

  • Rep. Buyer continues to assert that the VA's “core constituency” is “disabled and indigent” veterans. This appears to be his assertion and his alone. I cannot find anything that legislates this definition. Congress has made it clear that the VA is there to serve ALL veterans not just those who fall into Rep. Buyer's narrow definition. The 2005 edition of the Federal Benefits for Veterans and Dependents handbook clearly states, “Eligibility for most VA benefits is based upon discharge from active military service under other than dishonorable conditions.” The term “core constituency” is not found in the handbook. Rep. Buyer is redefining who is a veteran to serve his agenda.

  • The press release also states, “Provision of care for [veterans not in the “core constituency”] was contingent on the VA having sufficient resources for its high-priority enrollees.” There is an element of truth here. If Congress had been properly funding the VA, “sufficient resources” would not be an issue. So, it's not a problem of too many veterans. It's a problem of not enough funding to handle the healthcare needs of qualified veterans. Rep. Buyer is twisting facts to serve his agenda.

  • Rep. Buyer says, “America has kept faith with its veterans.” Tell that to the veterans in Portland, Oregon, and many other cities, who have to wait at least 12 months for medically necessary surgery. They might have a different opinion. Rep. Buyer is in denial to serve his agenda.

  • “The influx of enrollees who are not service-connected has strained the VA's ability to provide quality care to high-priority veterans who need it most,” said Rep. Buyer. Again, he has it backwards. Lack of funding is the reason the VA is strained. And this type of faulty reasoning deliberately pits veteran against veteran. Reality does not appear to be part of Rep. Buyer's agenda.

  • The most dangerous of Rep. Buyer's statements is the constant use of, “This was not our intent in Congress.” Rep. Buyer claims the “intent of Congress” was only to care for his “core constituency” veterans, not all veterans. Past Congresses knew very well what they were doing when they carefully defined VA benefits. What Rep. Buyer is really saying is that he is “intent” on rewriting the VA benefits handbook to fit his agenda.

  • Rep. Buyer speaks of “VA studies indicating that [enrolling veterans under the Veterans' Health Care Eligibility Reform Act of 1996 ] would likely be budget-neutral.” I have never seen such a study. I can't find such a study. If one exists, please forward it to me. But, if anyone at the VA or in Congress honestly thought that allowing potentially millions of veterans to enroll in the VA system would not have an economic impact, they were living in Fantasyland. This fantasy seems to fit Rep. Buyer's agenda.

  • “We must ensure that…growth does not endanger high quality veterans health care,” Rep. Buyer continues. It won't, if the VA is properly funded. It's just that simple. Then Rep. Buyer goes on to push for enrollment fees for many veterans.



It is obvious. Rep. Steve Buyer wants veterans to pay for their healthcare. When they can get it. If they can get it.

There's more. Rep. Buyer is “intent” on rewriting the VA benefits handbook with, as he says, “everything on the table.” He also says that veterans who currently receive healthcare and compensation might not be exempt from changes in regulations.

The vehicle for these changes is the Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission. The VDBC will, according to its charter, determine “the appropriateness of the benefits, the appropriateness of the level of the benefits, and the appropriate standard(s) for determining whether a disability or death of a veteran should be compensated .” The VDBC is, supposedly, bipartisan. There are nine Republican appointees and four Democrat appointees on the Commission -- you figure it out.

The VDBC's first meeting is May 9 and 10 in Washington, D.C. If the Commission follows its charter and takes Rep. Buyer's suggestions to heart, we will be able to watch our VA benefits disappear right before our eyes.

Why did Rep. Buyer issue this press release? He has an agenda to sell and it's a hard sell. Dismantling VA benefits is not popular, and Rep. Buyer has received a fair amount of bad press about his plans. This press release is his way of trying to counter all of that bad press.

Well, I must congratulate Rep. Steve Buyer's Public Relations person for writing a great “one-cheek sneak” press release. It had a great title, a quick read made it sound good, and by Monday most of the media will have forgotten about it. But there was nothing but bad news for veterans. Just like a real, live “one-cheek sneak” that didn't quite work -- this one stinks!


© 2005 Larry Scott. All opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of Military.com.
 
 



 



Military Opinions Index


Member Center


FREE Newsletter


Military Report


Equipment Guides


Installation Guides


Military History