Home
Benefits
News
entertainment
shop
finance
careers
education
join military
community
  
 

Joe Galloway: Gonzales' Fingerprints All Over Un-American Behavior
Joe Galloway: Gonzales' Fingerprints All Over Un-American Behavior

 

About the Author

Joseph L. Galloway is the senior military correspondent for Knight Ridder Newspapers and a nationally syndicated columnist. One of America's preeminent war correspondents, with more than four decades as a reporter and writer, he recently concluded an assignment as a special consultant to Gen. Colin Powell at the State Department.

Galloway, a native of Refugio, Texas, spent 22 years as a foreign and war correspondent and bureau chief for United Press International, and nearly 20 years as a senior editor and senior writer for U.S. News & World Report magazine. His overseas postings include tours in Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, India, Singapore and three years as UPI bureau chief in Moscow in the former Soviet Union. During the course of 15 years of foreign postings Galloway served four tours as a war correspondent in Vietnam and also covered the 1971 India-Pakistan War and half a dozen other combat operations.
In 1990-1991 Galloway covered Desert Shield/Desert Storm, riding with the 24th Infantry Division (Mech) in the assault into Iraq. General H. Norman Schwarzkopf has called Galloway "The finest combat correspondent of our generation -- a soldier's reporter and a soldier's friend."

Special Feature: "Discharged and Dishonored"
This special report looks at the plight of our nation's veterans, and their battle to claim their benefits.

Full Joe Galloway Bio

Joe Galloway Archives

Special Report: Read Joe Galloway's new column for Knight Ridder Newspapers on
Echo Company.

Sound Off! -- Have an opinion about this article? Visit the Joe Galloway discussion forum.

Military Opinions Index


Your Two Cents

Submit your stories, news items, or a benefits update -- and help Military.com bring the best, most important stories to your fellow servicemembers, veterans, and family members. Contribute here

February 3, 2005

[Have an opinion about this article? Visit the Joe Galloway discussion forum.]

WASHINGTON - President Bush this week gets the attorney general he wanted for his Cabinet, Alberto Gonzales, a longtime Texas friend and his White House counsel during his first term.

Although a president is given wide latitude in choosing his own Cabinet no matter which party controls the Senate, the time may come when the question is asked: Did Republican senators do George Bush any favor when they voted to confirm Gonzales as the nation's chief of law enforcement?

We have not yet gotten to the bottom, or the top, of the prisoner abuse scandals at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq or the extra-legal or illegal status of the foreigners imprisoned without charges or legal protection at America's own Devil's Island at Guantanamo, Cuba.

Despite his faulty memory and his denials in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Gonzales' fingerprints, and his legal advice, are all over the administration's papers that sought to turn both the U.S. Constitution and the Geneva Conventions on their heads.

Opinions and advice flowed out of the White House to both the Justice Department and the Defense Department beginning early in 2002 as to the lack of prisoner-of-war status and legal protection for people taken prisoner by American military forces, first in Afghanistan and then later in Iraq.

At the Pentagon that advice was turned into guidance that flowed down from Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Richard Myers, and from Myers on down the chain of command.

The message was fairly straightforward. The al-Qaeda and Taliban fighters in Afghanistan were not to be accorded POW status under the Geneva Conventions. They were not to be brought onto American soil, for fear they might seek the legal protections accorded our own citizens. We would build a concentration camp at the old American military base at Guantanamo. We would create military tribunals to try those we had evidence against, while the rest of them could rot in limbo forever.

Powerful men debated over what amount of mistreatment or pressure might constitute torture. Snarling dogs were OK. The water board that semi-drowns a prisoner might be OK. Twenty hours of non-stop interrogation by yelling and screaming guards was fine. Rumsfeld thought making a prisoner stand for four hours straight wasn't nearly enough; how about 8 hours? he asked. Naked prisoners locked for days in a very cold room? Not a problem. Some lawyer even wrote that the infliction of severe pain wasn't really torture unless it matched in intensity with organ failure or death.



At the bottom end of the chain of command it was Army specialists and sergeants, Reservists from the mountains of West Virginia and Pennsylvania, who would decide that the prisoners at Abu Ghraib were less than human and subject to no rule of law or common decency.

The powerful men who set all this in motion all rushed to denounce criminal acts committed by a few, a very few, bad people in soldier uniforms. Court-martial them and put them away and everything's just fine. Actually it isn't fine and it won't be until our government backs away from the abyss that lawless acts constitute.

Gonzales is the first of his Hispanic heritage to serve as our country's chief law enforcement officer. Normally that would be something for all of us to be proud of, something that speaks loudly about who were are and what we cherish.

But these are hardly normal times. The president and his men, including Gonzales, tell us that we are at war, the global war on terror. They have decided that some of those we take prisoner are outside the protection of law - either U.S. law or international law.

No doubt some future Congress, 30 or 40 years from now, will pass a resolution apologizing for this unseemly and undemocratic and un-American behavior.


[Have an opinion on this article? Sound off here.]

© 2005 Joe Galloway. All opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of Military.com.


 



 



Military Opinions Index


Member Center


FREE Newsletter


Military Report


Equipment Guides


Installation Guides


Military History