BRUSSELS, Belgium — Forces from NATO may join U.S. troops in troubled
Iraq following the handover to a new, sovereign government this summer — an idea
welcomed by American forces taxed by increasingly savage attacks.
On Friday, Secretary of State Colin Powell appealed for NATO boots in Iraq
during a visit to Brussels honoring the seven new alliance members from Eastern
"We don't yet have a NATO role for Iraq the way we have for Afghanistan,"
Powell told reporters, according to The Associated Press. "But it took time to
get NATO to take a positive role, an alliance role, in Afghanistan. With
respect to Iraq, we have not reached that point yet."
Though Powell did not predict quick success in persuading NATO ministers to
take up the cause, the likelihood of such a mission — long discussed among
generals and diplomats — increased last week. Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, NATO's
secretary-general, chastised the Spanish for their intention to withdraw from
Iraq, because the alliance, to which Spain belongs, is likely going there
"It was not in the most fortunate moment that Spain raised the intention to
draw its troops from Iraq," the secretary-general said during a visit to
Budapest, Hungary, according to Hungary's Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Scheffer
said NATO was preparing to play a role in Iraq and "it may take a commanding
role in a determined area."
That area is likely Iraq's south-central region, where Poland now leads an
international force of nearly 10,000 troops. Whether European leaders can put
the prewar controversies behind them and focus on postwar peacekeeping remains
to be seen. The current thinking is that the alliance could assume the Polish
command if Iraq becomes sovereign and the United Nations rules in favor of
expanded alliance participation.
"The political conditions for NATO to take on a more structural role, if you
will, are quite clear," said NATO spokesman James Appathurai.
On Thursday, the White House announced it would seek a new U.N. resolution
before turning over power to Iraqis on July 1. Appathurai said that a
fledgling, but free, Iraqi government could then ask for alliance help in the
form of troops.
"If they were to make a request, certainly it would be difficult for NATO not
to respond," Appathurai said.
Even without a new U.N. resolution, the Pentagon may see an opportunity for
NATO in Iraq. A Defense Department official, speaking on condition of
anonymity, said the military interprets last year's U.N. Security Council
Resolution 1483 as authorizing all member states to secure and rebuild Iraq.
All NATO countries are members of the United Nations, and several — most
obviously the United Kingdom — are already there.
Spain remains the biggest obstacle. Luis Rodriquez Zapatero, Spain's prime
minister-elect, plans to pull troops out of Iraq unless he sees a new U.N.
mandate. Powell has said he is uncertain as to whether even that would be
enough to placate Spain's incoming Socialists. Nonetheless, NATO's original
opponents of the Iraq invasion now say they will support peacekeeping there if
it were a sovereign country and if the mission were U.N.-approved.
"Both the German and French governments have said that if those two
conditions were met, they would not block a NATO collective role in Iraq, which
is encouraging," said Nicholas Burns, the U.S. ambassador to the alliance. "Now
this is a decision that's not yet been made, and it might not likely be made
for a month or two or three as we get closer to the Istanbul [Turkey] summit
[in June]. But it's something that we're very interested in and would like to
Burns believes the alliance can intervene in Iraq in a way both muscular and
"NATO is one of the world's most successful peacekeeping organizations, if
not the most successful peacekeeping organization," he said. "We're certainly
the strongest military alliance in the world. We have enormous power to do
positive things, and so there's a feeling at this headquarters that we ought to
seriously consider such a role. It would keep the allies focused on Iraq. For
many of them, it would be a way to stay in Iraq, because of course NATO has a
great public support and parliamentary support across Europe."
He also pointed to the alliance's record of persuading non-member states —
nations such as Ukraine, Russia, Egypt and Jordan — to send troops to its other
Said Burns: "That's a good template for what we want to do in Iraq."
Sound Off...What do you think?
Join the discussion.
This article is provided courtesy
of Stars & Stripes, which got its start as
a newspaper for Union troops during the Civil War, and
has been published continuously since 1942 in Europe and
1945 in the Pacific. Stripes reporters have been
in the field with American soldiers, sailors and airmen
in World War II, Korea, the Cold War, Vietnam, the Gulf
War, Bosnia and Kosovo, and are now on assignment in the
Stars & Stripes Website
Copyright 2004 Stars & Stripes. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.