|
|
| Headlines | News Home | Video News | Early Brief | Forum | Passdown | Discussions | Benefit Updates | Defense Tech |
|
Tough Road for GI Bill Reform
Military.com | By Terry Howell | September 26, 2007
Soon after being sworn in, the 110th Congress brought a flurry of proposed GI Bill reforms to both houses of Congress. With a new party in charge and 24 GI Bill-related bills introduced on the floor, the political climate seemed right for real change. As Representative Rick Larsen (D-WA) said in a May press release, "Times have changed, and we owe it to our veterans to keep up."
Each of the proposed bills address specific failings of the current Montgomery GI Bill, which includes arbitrary deadlines, mandatory payroll contributions, limited benefit transferability, inequity between active duty and reserve programs, and inadequate payment rates. In January, Representative Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD) was one of the first to jump in as he reintroduced his "Bartlett Montgomery GI Bill Act" from the previous year. Bartlett's bill would allow servicemembers to elect to transfer their GI Bill benefit to a dependent upon re-enlistment, reimburse the GI Bill enrollment contributions for those who extend their service, and increase the GI Bill payment rate for members of the National Guard and Reserve. Currently the GI Bill only allows transferability under very limited circumstances. Other GI Bill reform related bills that have been introduced in 2007 include the following:
Of the 24 bills currently before the 110th Congress, the "Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2007," penned by Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA), offers the most radical and sweeping changes and has the largest support in the Senate. Webb's bill would create an entirely new GI Bill program for those who have served on or after Sept. 11, 2001. Webb's new program would provide direct tuition assistance and a $1000 monthly stipend for veterans and active duty that enroll in VA approved higher education programs. In addition this bill would extend the 10-year benefit eligibility limit to 15 years. Rep. Robert Scott (D-VA) introduced a duplicate bill in the House in June. "Our nation has never erred when it made sustained new investments in higher education and job training," Webb said. "The bill I have introduced is not only the right thing to do for our men and women in uniform, but it is also strong tonic for an economy plagued by growing disparities in wealth, stagnant wages, and the outsourcing of American jobs." However, to date, none of proposed legislation has made it out of committee. It appears the initial spotlight on reform has dimmed and the calls for change have quieted. This lack of activity may indicate that 2007 will turn out to be just another year of missed opportunities. According to Jack Mordente, president of the National Association of Veterans Program Administrators (NAVPA), "It will take two things to get any of the 24 GI Bill related bills passed: bi-partisan cooperation and money." Each year members of Congress attempt to show their support for veterans by introducing new GI Bill legislation, but in the end these bills typically die in committee. Without a bi-partisan effort to drive GI Bill reform, Sen. Webb's bill -- like the other 23 related bills before Congress -- will stand little chance of passage. Take action on this issue - notify your elected officials: Sound Off...What do you think? Join the discussion. Copyright 2009 Military.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |
What's Hot
|
|
|
|
|