|
[Have an opinion about the views expressed in these commentaries?
Sound
off in the Discussion Forum.]
January 13, 2005: Military Education - We Are Stuck in the Past
"Evidence exists that it is time for drastic changes to the way we educate our cadets to become officers."
January 6, 2005: Military Education - Tools exist now, just use them
"If we are going to really 'Transform' the future force, we need to start now with the next generation."
December 20, 2004: The Specter of 'Taylorism'
"Believing that the Army is like a business or that good business practices will solve military problems are examples of misplaced analogies that take its leaders off the cliff."
September
21, 2004: Creating an Adaptive Officer Corps
"A true “perform or out” promotion system works with less reliance
on an OER system that in the past has pitted officer against officer,
particularly if the accession gateway into the profession is tougher."
September
13 , 2004: An Army Built on Trust
"We have intelligent, hard-working people in the Army who need
the autonomy to fight tough and determined opponents today and in
the future. "
January
5, 2004: A Year of Army Reform
"The Army’s transformation from the Cold War legacy of industrial
war to 4th Generation warfare often seems maddeningly slow – but
it is continuing. "
December
10, 2003: The New Officer Corps: '360-Degree Evaluations' (Part
3 of 3)
"A vital component of this new system will be what I term "360-degree
evaluations" of all officer candidates and commissioned officers,
the subject of this article. This is, simply put, formal ratings
of an officer's performance by superiors, peers - and subordinates
- the latter constituting a truly revolutionary innovation in the
Army's "top-to-bottom" personnel system."
November
25, 2003: Tools for Transforming the Officer Corps (Part 2 of 3)
"Above all else, the process should not have a goal of “meeting
missions” and filling quotas. Rather, it should only focus on having
candidates meet standards – quality, not quantity."
November
3, 2003: Transforming the U.S. Army Officer Corps (First of Two
Parts)
"One of the questions I frequently hear is how will unit manning
impact the Army's officer culture. A better way to phrase this is,
'Will the Army officer culture destroy unit manning before it has
a chance to succeed?'"
October
27, 2003: Army Crisis -- Form a Personnel Transformation Task Force
(Part 2 of 2)
"The U.S. Army can build a force that can fight “come as you
are wars” at present while preserving the force for a major conflict
in the future."
October
15, 2003: Army Crisis -- Personnel System Is the Foe (First of 2
Parts)
"I keep watching bold and corrective proposals to improve the
U.S. Army today getting cut to pieces on the chopping blocks of
compromise."
September
29, 2003: 'People Transformation' the Key to Military Reform
"Why change the U.S. military personnel system? Because the
current system is not producing quality combat and support units
that can perform the complex missions of 21st century warfare."
September
15, 2003: Put Everyone on the Line, By God!
"Mounds of evidence support unit manning. The real resistance
is to the true transformation of the Army that must take place to
allow unit manning to work. The two main changes...originated in
1912 and 1916 respectively. Someone remind me that it is 2003."
September
12, 2003: A Failed System
"To understand today's readiness problem confronting the U.S. military,
it is necessary to take a close look at how the services - in this
case, the U.S. Army - has managed its personnel for the past century."
August
28, 2003: Effective Personnel
"With the United States committed to a global war against terrorism
that will probably last for years, debate over the effectiveness
of the armed forces has intensified in the Pentagon, Congress and
the news media."
July
21, 2003: Learn from the Past Before It Is Too Late
"Now I am hearing we are beginning to use tried and failed
methods to keep up personnel strength in units in Iraq? Tell me
it is not so!"
Major Donald E. Vandergriff,
USA, an armor officer, teaches military science
at Georgetown University Army ROTC. Vandergriff
began his military career with the United States
Marine Corps, and has had extensive experience in
the field with the Army. After he transferred from
the Marine Corps to the Army National Guard, he
initially served as a cavalry platoon leader in
the 278th Armored Cavalry Regiment (TNARNG). Upon
entering active duty, he served in the Republic
of Korea as a tank platoon, tank company executive
officer and scout platoon leader for almost two
years; at the National Training Center (serving
both as an observer controller and in the OPFOR);
and in the Middle East and Germany.
He has his undergraduate degree in education from
the University of Tennessee, a graduate degree in
military history from American Military University,
and began his PhD studies in military history at
the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Major
Vandergriff has lectured extensively on military
effectiveness and cultural impacts in the United
States and Europe. He has also been the subject
of several articles that deal with military effectiveness
and military transformation, including features
in the Washington Post, The Atlantic Monthly,
The New Yorker Magazine, The National
Journal, Government Executive Magazine,
The Washington Monthly, Army Times,
Stars and Stripes, Norfolk News-Gazette
and Pittsburg Star.
He currently lives in Woodbridge, Virginia with
his wife Lorraine, and their three dogs and one
cat. Vandergriff has always been athletically competitive,
playing Rugby at the University of Tennessee 1982-1984,
at Fort Irwin 1987-1990, in Germany 1993-4, and
in Northern Virginia 1996-97. Vandergriff also participated
in Iron Man competitions from 1987-1990, and was
an avid snow skier. His current hobbies include
Tennessee college football, military wargaming,
mountain biking, hiking and his dogs.
Donald
Vandergriff: Archive
Discussion
Forum
Have an opinion on this commentary? Sound off.
Get
Breaking Military News Alerts
|
|
|
© 2005 Major Donald E. Vandergriff. All
opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily
reflect those of Military.com.
|