Search
Resources
Service Info
Community
Reference
Historical
• Today's Headlines
• Military.com News Archives
• Military Legends
Join our discussion here.

Bush Outlines Defense Reforms





ANNAPOLIS, Md., May 25, 2001 (United Press International via COMTEX) -- President Bush on Friday broadly outlined upcoming Defense Department reforms, saying the U.S. military of the future would be "defined less by size and more by mobility and swiftness."

Bush addressed a graduating class at the U.S. Naval Academy, where he previewed widely anticipated Pentagon changes by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.

"We must build forces that draw upon the revolutionary advances in the technology of war that will allow us to keep the peace by redefining war on our terms," Bush said. "I'm committed to building a future force that is defined less by size and more by mobility and swiftness, one that is easier to deploy and sustain, one that relies more heavily on stealth, precision weaponry and information technologies."

Bush added, "Changing the direction of our military is like changing the course of a mighty ship -- all the more reason for more research and development, and all the more reason to get started right away."

Rumsfeld has directed roughly 24 reviews of Pentagon policies and programs in a largely secret assessment known as "Rumsfeld's review."

Rumsfeld met with members of Congress on Wednesday as part of a series of discussions of his ongoing review. Pentagon spokesman Rear Adm. Craig Quigley said that the meetings would not reveal Rumsfeld's recommendations, but update Capitol Hill on his methods and progress. Rumsfeld also talked about the much-delayed 2002 defense budget submission to Congress.

Neither Rumsfeld nor the White House has set a date for the completion of the defense review, but the administration is expected to reveal the bulk of the plan this fall, when Congress is to approve Pentagon funding in the annual budget.

The biggest change expected to come from the Rumsfeld review is a recommendation for the Pentagon to abandon the "two-war" readiness strategy, which calls for the military to be capable of fighting large-scale conflicts in opposite hemispheres at the same time.

For nearly a decade, the military has been guided by the requirement of being able to fight two major theater wars simultaneously -- wars widely understood to be against North Korea and Iraq.

But U.S. military action in recent years has been focused on smaller, more regional situations, like the bombing of Kosovo, enforcing "no-fly" zones in Iraq and dealing with humanitarian crises places like Africa.

Rumsfeld himself has hinted that the two-war strategy would be replaced with something that takes into account the many smaller operations the U.S. military is called on to support.

In 1999, when the war in Kosovo began, U.S. forces stationed at Incirlik Air Base, Turkey -- which would normally carry out no-fly-zone enforcement missions against Iraq -- were sent in large numbers to the Balkans to help with the 78-day bombing campaign. No northern no-fly zone enforcement missions were flown for nearly a month.

The Rumsfeld review is stirring some controversy on Capitol Hill and reportedly with some military commanders in the field. Some senior officers who have seen Rumsfeld's initial recommendations have reportedly voiced some doubt about the effectiveness of the overall strategy. And congressional critics say Rumsfeld has kept lawmakers at arm's length in the review process.

Copyright 2001 by United Press International.

 E-Mail This Page
 Printer-Friendly Format