Financial Protections for Military Members Go Too Far?

Share

A new series of rules is meant to give even more financial protection to service members and their families. But where does the spending babysitting stop and the personal responsibility begin?

Money savings 482

Currently on the books are three sets of rules or help. First, you have the Service Members Civil Relief Act (SCRA) that protects service members from high interest rates, among other things. Then there is the military arm of the Consumer Protection Bureau, a federal entity led by Holly Petraeus. They work as a watchdog to pursue and help prosecute predatory lenders.

Finally, you have the 2006 Military Lending Act. Those rules helped protect service members from predatory loans and the interest rates associated with them.

Now the administration, through an executive order, has expanded the types of loans covered by the Lending Act.

Among the changes are a 36 percent annual cap on the percentage rate of interest on products like credit cards, a requirement that creditors disclose a service member’s other lending options beyond high-cost credit and prohibiting creditors from requiring service members to submit to arbitration.

Many of the changes address problems brought to light in this Washington Post story on rent-to-own lender USA Discounters (which recently changed its name to USA Living). You have without a doubt seen their stores near the gate of your local military base. The store sells items to service members, many of them young with lacking financial savvy, at high interest. If a service member fails to pay, the store takes them to court in Virginia, regardless of whether the service member can be present to defend him or herself.

Curbing predatory lending practices is, without a doubt, a good thing. But some have questioned why these protections are expanding only for the military. They say this creates a "special class" of people. If these protections make sense for service members, why wouldn't they make sense for everyone else, too?

And Petraeus says that's OK.

“I would say, as far as I’m concerned, the military is a special class. It’s not just a job. They’re willing to lay their lives on the line for our country. If they’re given special protections, I’m all for it," she said at a recent event here at Fort Campbell.

What do you think? Should these protections be given to everyone? Or is the military a special enough group of people they we need these extra protections?

Share
SpouseBuzz

Military Spouse Videos

Master Class: Fearless: How to Be A Rich Military Spouse

First, there is the real you. Then there is the secret inner part of you blistering through all the...

Ukrainian Soldiers Freeze Sperm to Ensure Legacy

When Ukrainian soldier Vitalii Khroniuk was lying face to the ground in an attempt to protect himself from Russian...

US Invokes Defense Act for Formula Shortage

President Joe Biden on Wednesday invoked the Defense Production Act to speed production of infant formula and authorized flights...

First Lady Jill Biden Has a Message for Military Teens

Listen to a Military Child Appreciation Day message specifically for military teens from First Lady Dr. Jill Biden. (April...

Celebrate National Military Appreciation Month

National Military Appreciation Month is celebrated every May and is a declaration that encourages U.S. citizens to observe the...

View more