So, last month, I was doing what it seems like I do for about 80 percent of my working life--standing in an ice-cold exhibit hall at a defense conference, chatting with another defense reporter. We were in Washington, D.C. at the Office of Naval Researchs annual science and technology conference, which featured an entire day devoted to alternative energy.Did you see the cold fusion booth? I asked.The what? the other reporter asked.The cold fusion booth, I replied. There are naval folks here presenting cold fusion.No, no, thats not possible. This is a reputable conference, scoffed the other reporter.I pointed to the booth and told him to go over and check it out for himself. He came back toting some books and shaking his head in amazement. Personally, I kept my distance, as Ive had my fill these past few months with the far reaches of science [For the record, I admire the Office of Naval Researchs open-minded approach to cold fusion scientists--and I remain sympathetic to researchers in the field, but itd be nice to see something other than promises and old reports.]What was amazing for me, however, was not that there was a cold fusion booth at the naval conference, but that the cold fusion booth was about the only one there dedicated to energy issues. For all the talk of its commitment to alternative energy, the Pentagon doesnt appear to be taking steps to support spending on basic science and technology that could lead to breakthroughs. Forget basic science, even more advanced technology efforts, like hybrid vehicles, appear stalled, this month's National Defense magazine reports.Theres some work around the edges---fuel cells and solar energy, as a recent issue of Defense Technology International noted. But there's no concerted effort. One could argue that the Defense Department isnt really the place to do energy research, but the Pentagon has deeper pockets than the National Science Foundation and better luck with innovation and high-risk endeavors than the stodgy Department of Energy. The Pentagon also has innate self interest, as the countrys single largest consumer of fuel. A well-funded, scientifically sound approach to energy research could have big payoffs for the military.Or it would at least offer something better than a lonely couple booths at a trade show.- Sharon Weinberger
You May Also Like
Marine leaders have been vocal about their desire to build more cyber capabilities into the force.
The impacts on the military began building up in the second day of the government shutdown.
A lawmaker is calling on the Navy to consider adopting a specialization model of its surface officers.
Most Recent in DefenseTech
- The Marine Corps Wants to Make Cyber More Like Special Ops
- After Collisions, Lawmaker Presses Navy to Specialize Surface Forces
- Army Tests Secure Wi-Fi for Future Battlefield
- Army Chief Wants Robotic Vehicles, AI for Future Battles
- B-52s to Replace B-1Bs for Latest Bomber Rotation in the Pacific
Most Popular Military News
In preparation for the government shutdown, USAA is prepared to offer an interest-free payroll loans to eligible service memb...
The Defense Department has released details on what a shutdown means for pay and benefits this year.
Lewis was awarded the Silver Star for his actions in a 10-hour long firefight during the Mosul offensive.
The U.S. Army has identified two soldiers who were killed when the AH-64 Apache helicopter they were flying crashed early Sat...