Lead Paint, Asbestos Mitigation Plans Fall Short in Military Family Housing, IG Finds

FacebookTwitterPinterestEmailShare
Umit Spencer, (left) 88th Civil Engineering housing branch chief, and Eva Nunnally, (right) 88th CE senior officer housing inspector, perform a routine maintenance check of one of the Historic Brick Quarters homes at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Ohio, March 15, 2017. The Historic Brick Quarters, a horseshoe-shaped complex of officers’ housing was erected in 1934-1935 for the U.S. Army Air Officers of both Patterson Field and adjacent Wright Field, to create much-needed, permanent housing. (U. S. Air Forc
Umit Spencer, (left) 88th Civil Engineering housing branch chief, and Eva Nunnally, (right) 88th CE senior officer housing inspector, perform a routine maintenance check of one of the Historic Brick Quarters homes at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Ohio, March 15, 2017. The Historic Brick Quarters, a horseshoe-shaped complex of officers’ housing was erected in 1934-1935 for the U.S. Army Air Officers of both Patterson Field and adjacent Wright Field, to create much-needed, permanent housing. (U. S. Air Force photo by Michelle Gigante/Released)

Military families living in 38,000 housing units owned and operated by the U.S. government face health and safety risks such as lead-based paint, asbestos, radon and contaminated drinking water because the services have failed to monitor these threatening living conditions, the Defense Department's Inspector General found.

Inspectors at seven bases overseas and one in the U.S. found flaking paint that may have carried lead in homes, as well as materials that contained asbestos. They also uncovered problems with the management and mitigation of radon, the naturally occurring element that can seep into homes through foundations and cause lung cancer, and failures in monitoring drinking water supplies.

At Spangdahlem Air Base in Germany, for example, base officials were not testing for legionella, the bacteria that causes Legionnaires' disease, even though U.S. and German government standards require it.

Related: Marine Corps Family Wins $2 Million Lawsuit Over Moldy Base Housing

The issues were so extensive across installations that the IG concluded that other government-run military homes likely have similar issues.

"We believe the deficiencies we identified ... indicate that the potential exists for similar deficiencies in the management of health and safety hazards in government-owned, government-controlled military family housing worldwide," wrote Randolph Stone, the DoD's assistant inspector general for evaluations of space, intelligence, engineering and oversight.

"If the DoD and the services do not improve policies and procedures to identify, mitigate or minimize, monitor, disclose, and oversee health and safety hazards in [this] military family housing, the DoD and the services will continue to risk the health and safety of service members and their families," he wrote.

The report follows a scandal that erupted in 2018 and 2019, exposing health and safety hazards in privatized military housing, to include dangerous levels of lead, mold, pestilence and other problems.

In September 2018, Congress directed the DoD IG to examine the extent of lead contamination in government-owned base housing, which makes up less than 16% of all U.S. military housing worldwide. But the IG decided to extend the scope of its investigation following congressional hearings on privatized housing.

The Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps own and operate 38,029 housing units, including 1,420 in the U.S. and 36,609 overseas, while another 200,000 homes, mainly in the U.S., are operated by private companies.

For its investigation, the DoD IG office looked at eight installations: U.S. Army Garrison Humphreys, South Korea; U.S. Army Garrison Wiesbaden and Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany; Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; Commander Fleet Activities Yokosuka, Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni and Kadena Air Base, Japan; and Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio.

Inspectors looked at the installations' management processes and record-keeping on programs to mitigate nine health and safety hazards, including lead-based paint; materials containing asbestos; radon; fire and electrical safety; water quality; window fall prevention; mold; carbon monoxide; and pest management.

The inspectors found that, for the most part, the installations sufficiently managed electrical systems and fire hazards, as well as mold, carbon monoxide, pests and window fall prevention.

According to the report, installation officials "established and implemented policies and procedures to identify, mitigate or minimize, monitor, disclose, and oversee the aforementioned health and safety hazards," including educating residents on mold prevention -- one of the most common complaints from families who live in privatized military housing.

But for lead, asbestos and other hazards, DoD inspectors found widespread issues. For example, they found that residents did not receive pamphlets on lead-based paint required by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. They discovered that just three bases had active asbestos mitigation programs, while only two notified their residents of asbestos-containing materials in their homes. And only one, Wright- Patterson, had long-term radon mitigation, although five of the eight had conducted radon screening and testing in their homes.

As a result of the inspections, the DoD IG made several recommendations to the under secretary of defense for acquisition and sustainment, as well as the under secretary of defense for personnel and readiness to improve DoD policy. The office also made recommendations to the assistant secretaries of the Army, Navy and Air Force responsible for installations and the environment.

In response to the report, the DoD said it would review its existing policies to ensure they address health and safety hazards, with the exception of conditions like mold, for which the federal government has not set exposure limits or safety standards.

The 2018-2019 privatized housing scandal resulted in reforms that included inspections of nearly all military housing owned or operated by contractors, repairs to homes and implementation of a tenant bill of rights that gave tenants more power in dealing with their landlords, to include access to military legal assistance and the expectation that their homes should be kept in working order.

-- Patricia Kime can be reached at Patricia.Kime@Monster.com. Follow her on Twitter @patriciakime.

Read More: The Bad Decisions That led to Military Housing Woes

Show Full Article