A Bold Afghan Peace Offer, but are the Taliban Interested?

In this Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2018 file photo, Afghanistan's President Ashraf Ghani, center, poses for a group photo with delegates during the 2nd Kabul Process conference at the Presidential Palace in Kabul. Ghani has put a peace offer on the table, and analysts say the ball is now in the Taliban's court, yet there are no signs the Taliban want to play and some indication they are not interested, at least not yet. (AP Photo/Rahmat Gul)
In this Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2018 file photo, Afghanistan's President Ashraf Ghani, center, poses for a group photo with delegates during the 2nd Kabul Process conference at the Presidential Palace in Kabul. Ghani has put a peace offer on the table, and analysts say the ball is now in the Taliban's court, yet there are no signs the Taliban want to play and some indication they are not interested, at least not yet. (AP Photo/Rahmat Gul)

ISLAMABAD — Afghanistan's President Ashraf Ghani has put a peace offer on the table, and analysts say the ball is now in the Taliban's court. But so far the militants are showing no sign of being interested.

Ghani's offer calls for unconditional talks accompanied by a cease-fire, recognition of the Taliban as a political party, an office in Kabul and the release of some prisoners. Ghani said he would also try to get Taliban leaders removed from international terrorist lists, as well as provide them with passports to allow them to travel freely.

The Taliban, who have long demanded to talk directly to the United States before the Kabul government, replied with silence.

Early indications are not promising.

Over the weekend, the Taliban issued a rambling English- language statement urging Islamic clerics to boycott a gathering later this month in Indonesia, where religious leaders from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Indonesia are to meet to see if they can offer a path to peace in Afghanistan. The conference in Bogar in Indonesia's West Java is organized by the Indonesian Ulema Council, an association of clerics, but with official Afghan support.

The Taliban denounced the gathering, warning the Afghan clerics: "Do not afford an opportunity to the invading infidels in Afghanistan to misuse your name and participation in this conference as means of attaining their malicious objective."

Another discouraging sign came from a Taliban official familiar with his movement's stand on Ghani's offer. He criticized it, telling The Associated Press that it did not address Taliban demands for the withdrawal of international forces from Afghanistan nor the implementation of an Islamic system.

Many in Afghanistan and elsewhere, particularly women's rights activists, are fearful of the Taliban's hard-line interpretation of an Islamic system and deeply oppose giving the group any room to implement it. During Taliban rule, which ended with the U.S.-led invasion in 2001, girls were denied education and women access to jobs. Men were forced to wear beards, and music and television were outlawed.

Since their ouster, the Taliban have issued several statements saying they would allow girls to go to school — but under strict Islamic guidelines — and let women work — but segregated from male colleagues. They have not committed to women in leadership roles or to their equal participation with Afghan men.

The Taliban official said the aim of his movement's war is two-fold — "to end the invasion and enforce an Islamic system. Has Ashraf Ghani talked about this? It seems Ghani does not want peace and is just joking." The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the Taliban position.

Still, Ghani's peace offer has met with widespread approval. Though the president has repeatedly urged the Taliban to embrace peace talks, this was the first time he lay out a set of offers. Even neighbor Pakistan, who has been sharply criticized by Afghanistan and the United States for harboring Taliban on their soil, has lauded Ghani's offer.

But analysts caution that many details are left uncertain, such as who would stop fighting first. And there are major unknowns external to the proposal itself. Can Ghani heal a deepening crisis within his own profoundly divided government enough to present a united front at the negotiation table? And the elephant in the room: Is the United States seeking a more permanent presence in Afghanistan?

A negotiated peace is widely seen as the only way to end Afghanistan's war, which is now in its 17th year and caused the deaths of tens of thousands of civilians. Over the years, it has cost the United States alone more than $122 billion.

"Any Afghanistan peace process is going to be long and difficult, with ups and downs, and there will always be plenty of room for skepticism that it won't succeed," said Andrew Wilder, vice-president of the Asia Programs at the United States Institute of Peace. "However, I'm even more skeptical that any side will win the war, so the only alternative to another four decades of violence and bloodshed is to prioritize the peace process."

Wilder will be among dozens of Afghan watchers attending this week's conference on Afghanistan at the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) in the Norwegian capital beginning on Tuesday. In 2015 Oslo brokered previous talks with the Taliban.

Thomas Ruttig, co-founder of the independent Afghanistan Analysts Network, called Ghani's offer "a good beginning, not more, not less."

"Most elements of the proposal have been brought up earlier, but now they come in a combined form," he said. "A ceasefire was officially mentioned for the first time, but without any explanation: Who first, both sides together? And if the latter, how to get there? This needs talks first."

The Taliban have been consistent in their demand for talks with the United States before talking to the Afghan government. Washington has been equally insistent in its official stance refusing to talk directly to the Taliban, though it has held secret talks in the past.

Ruttig also pointed out that the final declaration that came out of last month's Kabul conference that produced Ghani's peace offering promised that future talks could involve "contested aspects of the future international presence" in Afghanistan. Ruttig said that could provide an opening for direct or indirect talks between the U.S. and the Taliban.

Michael Kugelman, Asia Program deputy director at the Washington-based Woodrow Wilson Center, said there is also no legal obstacle to U.S. talks with the Taliban because until now Washington has not declared the group a terrorist organization.

"If the U.S. is really serious about peace in Afghanistan, then it will need to be more open to the idea of talking to a Taliban organization that's given little indication that it's prepared to negotiate with Kabul any time soon," he said. "The best way for Washington to go into a dialogue with the Taliban would be to see it as a platform from which to make a direct appeal to the insurgents to speak directly with the Afghans."

This article was written by Kathy Gannon from The Associated Press and was legally licensed through the NewsCred publisher network. Please direct all licensing questions to legal@newscred.com.

Show Full Article