|
|
![]() |
Early Brief | Headlines | Warfighter's Forum | Discussions | Benefit Updates | Defense Tech |
|
Rehearsal
Thus far, the great swine flu "pandemic" exists mainly in newspaper headlines. "World Ends Tomorrow" always sells a few extra papers. I'm waiting for the Onion: "Pigs flu." If swine flu follows the route of its 1918-1919 predecessor, receding over the summer, then coming back in a more virulent version next winter, it could get serious. But so far, the "pandemic's" most interesting aspect is as a rehearsal for one of 4GW's most dangerous threats, the release of a genetically engineered plague. Genetic engineering is a hideous technology, crafted in Mordor. Honest blunders will be enough to unleash plagues on crops, critters (honeybees may have already been hit), and man. It offers Brave New World its final, almost inescapable control mechanism. Like every other technology man has invented, it will also be used in war. I have argued for years that a genetically engineered plague, a disease no one ever saw before and against which there are no defenses, could replicate what the Black Death brought to medieval Europe. Such a weapon could kill far more people than a single nuke or even several nukes. Worse, while building nuclear weapons requires vast facilities, genetic engineering is knowledge-based. No non-state entity will be able to build a fission or fusion weapon (they may buy or steal one), but they will be able to genetically engineer deadly diseases, if they can't already. Let us imagine, for a moment, that the ongoing swine flu epidemic were a deliberate rehearsal for release of a genetically engineered plague. What would be the lessons so far? First, the main target, the United States, offers a wonderful incubator right next door: Mexico. Mexico has densely populated slums; a culture in which life is lived socially, outside the home; and typical Third World standards of public health. Getting a plague started is tricky. It needs to achieve "critical mass" before it is detected. Mexico is just the "Petri dish" a 4GW attacker would need. An recent article in The Washington Post noted:
Second, the Washington Establishment will not even attempt to close the United States/Mexican border until it is too late. Spokesmen for the Obama administration said that an epidemic is preferable to the economic damage border closure would create. They would realize, too late, how wrong they were if the disease were a genetically engineered plague. But "too late" means a win for 4GW. The rehearsal shows the border will remain open, with vast movement of people, legally and illegally, between the United States and Mexico. Moving a plague northward, once Mexico has served its "incubator" function, will not be difficult. Third, Americans, driven by sensation-seeking media, will panic. Panic is a reasonable response to a plague; one of the best ways to survive the Black Death was to get out of town as soon as it appeared. But panic will help a 4GW attacker achieve what might be his main objective, serious damage to the American economy, even if public health measures succeed in containing the plague without major population loss. Osama himself has said that al Qaeda's main target is the American economy, since that is what Americas seem to care most about. Could the swine flu epidemic in fact be a trial run for an attack by a genetically engineered plague? Might the swine flu have been deliberately created for a test? The answer is almost certainly no, although at this point scientists do not know how this version of flu arose. But "objectively," as a Marxist would say, it is a test nonetheless. We would be wise to regard it as such, and grade our response carefully. To date, we have gotten an F, largely because of the Establishment's refusal to consider closing the U.S./Mexican border. The only effective immediate response to a genetically engineered plague is likely to be quarantine. Quarantines start with border controls. America and other countries used to know that, and they routinely closed borders and quarantined arriving travelers when epidemics were loose. "Globalist" ideology, which is shared by both political parties, rejects border controls as hostile to its vision of "One World." In a century when genetically engineered plagues will serve as weapons of mass destruction, that ideology may literally be the death of us. |
About William Lind
William Sturgiss Lind, Director of the Center for Cultural Conservatism at the Free Congress Foundation, is a native of Cleveland, Ohio, born July 9, 1947. He graduated magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa from Dartmouth College in 1969 and received a Master's Degree in History from Princeton University in 1971. He worked as a legislative aide for armed services for Senator Robert Taft, Jr., of Ohio from 1973 through 1976 and held a similar position with Senator Gary Hart of Colorado from 1977 through 1986. He joined Free Congress Foundation in 1987.
Mr. Lind is author of the Maneuver Warfare Handbook (Westview Press, 1985); co-author, with Gary Hart, of America Can Win: The Case for Military Reform (Adler & Adler, 1986); and co-author, with William H. Marshner, of Cultural Conservatism: Toward a New National Agenda (Free Congress Foundation, 1987). Mr. Lind co-authored the prescient article, "The Changing Face of War: Into the Fourth Generation," which was published in The Marine Corps Gazette in October, 1989 and which first propounded the concept of "Fourth Generation War." What's Hot
|