Improbably, an opportunity has arisen in Iraq for the U.S. to attain two of its most important goals, namely obtaining some legitimacy for the al-Maliki "government" and getting American troops out.  This could be the last international express leaving Baghdad Central Station, and we should be on it. 

The opportunity arisies from a breakdown in negotiations to draw up a status of forces agreement and a so-called "security framework," which is an (unequal) alliance in all but name.  According to the June 11 Washington Post: "The Americans are making demands that would lead to the colonization of Iraq," said Sami al-Askari, a senior Shiite politician on parliament's foreign relations committee who is close to Prime Minister Nouri al-Mailiki.  "If we can't reach a fair agreement, many people think we should say, ‘Goodbye, U.S. troops.  We don't need you here anymore.'"

Washington should be dancing in the streets.  There could at this point be no better way for American troops to exit Iraq than in response to a request from the Iraqi "government."  Contrary to the neo-cons's promises, the Iraqis did not welcome American troops with flowers, but they might but they might be willing to toss a few our way as we pulled out.  We could withdraw from a failed enterprise with flags flying and drums rolling, maintaining a half-way credible pretense that we did not lose.  We are not likely to do better than that.  

At the same time, the al-Maliki "government" has a heaven – sent opportunity to acquire what it needs most, namely some legitimacy.  So long as it is propped up by American troops, it will remain Vichy.  But if it ordered the Americans out, it would suddenly begin to look like a real Iraqi government.  That is far from enough to restore a state in Iraq, but it would be a step in the right direction.

There is little doubt that if a referendum were held in Iraq on sending the Americans home, it would win in a landslide.  Iraqi politicians know where their public is on this issue, and like politicians everywhere they want to swim with the tide. 

More, some seem to sense that the Americans' time in Iraq is ending if not over.  As usual, the Desert Fox, Muqtada al-Sadr, is making all the right moves.  He is positioning himself as leader of all Iraqi resistance to the American occupation, not just head of a Shiite faction.  By welcoming Iraqi troops (many of whom are his militiamen) into areas he controls but fighting the Americans, he is splitting his opposition.  Most importantly, he is maintaining his credentials as the Iraqi leader least willing to condone a continued occupation, thereby gaining that decisive quality, legitimacy. 

If the Iraqi government orders American troops out, the result would be a win-win situation.  America would win, and so would Iraq.  In fact, it would be a win-win outcome, and there's the rub.  The third winner would be Iran.  A Shiite – dominated Iran free of American occupation would have a close relationship with Iran.  In fact, in order to defend itself in a nasty neighborhood Iraq would probably conclude a formal alliance with Iran. 

Washington's response should be a rapproachment with Iran.  After all, our real enemy is not any state but the non-state forces of the Fourth Generation.  But that is not how the Bush administration will view the matter. 

On the contrary, faced with the possibility of an Iranian strategic victory, courtesy of the American troops who overthrew Saddam, the U.S. government is likely to take the fool's way out, escalation.  Inside the White House bubble, the argument for attacking Iran might become irresistible, driven as it would be by panic.  As I have warned repeatedly, the outcome of such folly could very well include the loss of the American army now in Iraq, not to mention another doubling in the price of oil.  As usual under the second-worst President in American history (Woodrow Wilson still ranks number one), we have seen the enemy, and he is us.  All we have to do to get out of Iraq with some dignity while strengthening the government we installed there is push that government into ordering us home.  That should be easy enough; what intransigence in the ongoing negotiations cannot achieve a few million Swiss francs should certainly manage.  Instead, we will refuse to board the last train out, then blow up the railroad.  It it were happening to someone else, it would all be comical. 

Note: I was recently informed that, by order, the good Marines who guard the gates a Quantico are wearing body armor in the steamy Virginia summer (with soft covers).  Not surprisingly, they are melting.  What, I wondered, is this to protect them from?  Bee stings?  Bird droppings?  Then the light went on.  It does nothing to protect the gate guards, but it does protect a sensitive part of one of their commander's anatomy.  Perhaps someone at the senior level might want to look into the matter.