Since the 1960s the combination of the antiwar and non-military serving sectors of academia, the media, the leaders of various peace causes, the "allergic to combat" upper income sector of society and the shrinkocracy have made various cases with various levels of proof that not only was the old Mothers for Peace poster correct that "war not healthy for children and other living things," but that it causes far more casualties than are normally counted.

Veterans have always found war downright hazardous to their health. But now their own lobbying groups such as the Veterans of Foreign Wars, American Legion, and Vietnam Veterans of America, and employees of the Veterans Administration itself have decided to facilitate a blizzard of dubious veterans' benefit claims worse than the wildest dreams of any welfare queen.

Now the anti-military groups and some veterans' lobbyists appear to be combining forces in asking that the honored Purple Heart for those physically wounded in combat be awarded for mental conditions based upon some highly dubious criteria. And this proposal is actually receiving serious consideration by the Bush Department of Defense.

Claims of injuries from PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder are being used to grossly inflate the casualty rate and establish a whole new class of dubious "victims" out of veterans who served their country and are now being induced to serve themselves by both those who hate the American military while, of course, ritually praising their "service," and veteran lobbyist groups who claim to speak "for veterans" while increasing their ability to sell veterans on the benefits they get by paying for membership.

In doing so, they have helped veterans and in some cases people who simply claimed to be veterans make hundreds of thousands of PTSD injury claims in what military records fraud expert B.G. Burkett calls "by far the largest collection of military disability fraud cases in the history of the United States, all alleging PTSD."

PTSD is a real condition and many do suffer from it, but it is a lot easier to fake than it is to diagnose, and with the sloppy standards currently in effect, it is inevitable that the system is constantly abused.

Seventy per cent of the disability claims presented to the Veterans Administration come through what is called "a membership representative," who often works for one of the veteran's lobbyist organizations and helps applicants with the difficult paperwork. One of the recent candidates for president of the Vietnam Veterans of America had to disqualify himself when it was revealed that he had admitted drawing up phony claims for disabilities by VVA members to the Veterans' Administration.

Since a 100 percent disability payment for PTSD can be worth more than $30,000 a year for life, it is not surprising that a high percentage of veterans working for the VA also receive payments for PTSD themselves. It also makes the grantee eligible for a 50 percent disability payment under Social Security. Together they total over $40,000 a year, tax free and inflation-indexed.

Burkett, a veteran himself, has been hired as an expert to the Marine Corps and the FBI, and testified on cases of phony assertions of rank, military service and medals awarded in numerous legal cases. His book Stolen Valor led to the recent passage of the Stolen Valor Act of 2006.  The Act established Federal penalties for attempts to pass off fraudulent claims for medals or military service.

Newspapers have carried stories for years about Burkett's work in helping unmask pretenders to military rank and honors who had been showing up on 4th of July reviewing stands and public ceremonies for years in full dress uniforms, with ranks and decorations they had invented rather than earned.

In an attempt to try to get a handle on the flood of PTSD disability claims overwhelming the Veteran's Administration, its Inspector General department briefed Burkett about a pilot study the VA had made of 2100 random PTSD cases that had been extracted out of the 287,000 cases they were considering at the time.

Of that sample group, for example, more than 28 percent had no medical trauma event of any kind in their records. And the rate of successful PTSD claims processed through the VA system was far higher in some parts of the country. Some areas approved 60 percent of claims with no trauma record while only 10% were granted in others. The VA seemed on the edge of uncovering the most massive fraud in its history and one in which it bore at least part of the blame. As the second largest agency in the Federal government with almost 300,000 employees it was at least possible for it to do a solid evaluation.

But as soon as word of the VA's intention of a broad review of hundreds of thousands of PTSD claims costing potentially billions of dollars got out, Congressional members like Barack Obama and Lane Evans proposed legislation to block any review of possible fraud as an attack upon the rights of veterans. Not surprisingly, no review has taken place. In the meantime the paperwork on PTSD disability claims has gotten so huge at the VA and the expense of reviewing each claim is so high, that the VA is considering routinely granting disability payments before finally approving claims.

There has been enough medal inflation in the American military over the past half century. From the medals "package" that started being handed out like Red Cross donuts in the Vietnam War to the rows of ticket-punching "I was there" ribbons that clutter the chest of an 18 1/2-year-old who had some involvement in the current conflict in the Middle East, it is hard enough to separate those that mean something from the rest.

Gaming the military awards system for medals has always been a problem. The fictional Victorian Sir Harry Flashman was constantly able to get medals for bravery during his worst acts of cowardice. And the real Swift boat naval officer John Kerry managed to somehow get the three Purple Hearts it took him to get out of any further service in Viet Nam in just four months, without losing a single day on duty.

But the idea of seriously considering awarding the Purple Heart for an as yet difficult to establish PTSD condition that is the focus of an immense fraud being concealed from the public, whose taxes have to pay for it, by both the Executive and Legislative branches of the Federal Government, is a cynical obscenity.

Let's do the best we can to support the Military Order of the Purple Heart, made up of those to whom it has actually been awarded, in keeping the one medal established by the nation's first commander in chief and first President, George Washington, for what it is. It is one of the few awards that has maintained its value during all the medal inflation of the past 70 years since it was re-established by Douglas MacArthur.

It should not be allowed to fall the victim of the military's self-interested  "friends" and long-standing enemies. We don't need another worthless example of the inability of our society to tell a proud citation for what novelist Stephen Crane called "the red badge of courage" from the bloodless transmittal sheet for yet another questionable disability claim.

(Journalist Thomas Lipscomb served as an officer in the Army from 1961 to 1964. He was chairman of the Vietnam Veterans' Leadership employment program in New York. This article originally appeared at Real Clear Politics.)