Home
Benefits
News
entertainment
shop
finance
careers
education
join military
community
 
Search for Military News:  
Headlines News Home | Video News | Early Brief | Forum | Opinions | Discussions | Benefit Updates | Defense Tech
Helo Needs Still Unmet for Space Command
Aviation Week's DTI | Amy Butler | June 02, 2008
This article first appeared in Aviation Week's Aerospace Daily and Defense Report.

U.S. Air Force Space Command (AFSPC) is again pushing for a program to replace its aging UH-1N helicopters, saying that its current aircraft are too slow to handle the modern nuclear weapons support mission.

AFSPC vice chief Maj. Gen. Thomas Deppe says that the command has included a funding request in its fiscal 2010 draft budget to begin a program to replace the aging Hueys. "Any helicopter in the inventory is faster than that UH-1," he said during a breakfast speech May 28 hosted by the National Defense University Foundation. A new helicopter would need to have greater range, improved speed and armor protection, Deppe added.

The helicopters are used to escort nuclear weapons teams servicing the Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile fleet. They also are used to quickly transport security teams in the event of an alert at the missile fields. Today’s Huey lacks the range to traverse the largest of the missile fields in one mission.

"An 80-85 percent solution may be good enough," Deppe said, acknowledging that attempts to buy a Huey replacement in the past have failed to produce a viable program. "We could buy something off the shelf that could easily" handle the mission, he said.

Common helo

Most recently, the Air Force discussed the concept of a Common Vertical Lift Support Program, which would provide a common helicopter to replace those used by AFSPC as well as the aging executive transports operating out of Andrews Air Force Base, Md.

However, helicopter procurements for USAF appear to be paced by the Combat Search and Rescue-X (CSAR-X) quagmire. The Air Force is examining responses from CSAR-X bidders with an award possible this fall.

Boeing won the $879 million CSAR-X development contract over designs from Sikorsky and Lockheed Martin/AgustaWestland. However, a new competition was fashioned after the losing bidders protested and the Government Accountability Office found that the Air Force misrepresented life-cycle cost data during the first competition in 2006.

Sound Off...What do you think? Join the discussion.

Copyright 2008 Aviation Week's DTI. All opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of Military.com.

 
About Aviation Week's DTI

Defense Technology International (DTI) -- Integrated intelligence, Global perspective on current and emerging land, sea and air defense technologies.


More Stories From DTI:

Laser Progress Catches Military Interest

Kearsarge Parties, Gets Down to Business

Upgraded Black Hawk Flies by Wire