
|
Page 2
[Have an opinion on this column? Sound off in Military.com
at the Frontlines.]
Another destabilizing factor for Russia and its environs is the devastation of AIDS, now spreading in that country like the plague. Within a decade, maybe two, at the rate new AIDS cases are happening, Russia will lack enough healthy youths to serve its basic defensive needs. There is, unfortunately, a substitute for massed able-bodied manpower, one that can a) be very effective as a deterrent with worldwide reach, b) serve to intimidate peoples living just beyond the Russian Federation's restless borders, and -- in extremis -- c) provide a means to prosecute a local or global shooting war. I'm referring to nuclear weapons, which Putin himself has publicly said will form the backbone of Moscow's next-generation military muscle.
Russia invested ambitiously to deploy a new ICBM, the SS-27, specifically designed to get through any conceivable U.S. missile-shield protective system. An SS-27, reportedly, can carry a single warhead with a yield of up to a megaton, along with countermeasures and decoys, plus hardening against anti-missile lasers and electromagnetic pulses, with the ability for the warhead's atmospheric reentry body to maneuver intelligently against last-ditch kinetic-kill ABM weapons. Russia is well aware that the missile shield system presently being contemplated in the U.S. would be of limited capacity, intended only to intercept (if it ever works right) a small number of rogue or terrorist ICBMs: a wise insurance policy indeed for America. Russia already has more than enough older-model ICBMs to utterly swamp the Bush administration's desired missile shield, as Putin is fully aware -- and the U.S. has more than once offered to freely share missile-shield technology with Russia. Reagan said this to Gorbachev repeatedly, but was never believed. Alas, one reason that the USSR sometimes quickly violated arms reduction treaties signed with the U.S. and others was a total lack of trust of the outside world on Moscow's part, verging on rampant paranoia. (One pact that banned germ warfare R&D, ratified in the early 1970s, is an infamous example of subsequent Soviet widespread cheating.)


|
So, why would a supposedly cash-strapped Russia, bristling with hundreds of H-bomb-tipped ICBMs as it is, have spent heavily on deploying several operational SS-27 missile regiments (comprising a dozen-plus silo-based or mobile SS-27s per regiment), with more on the way, unless the Kremlin's agenda was inherently belligerent -- militarily, diplomatically, and most of all psychologically? An ABM system limited to stopping a handful of terrorist (or even just accidental) ICBM launches is not destabilizing against the US/Russia mutual assured destruction status quo -- except at the level of bellicose (or misguided "anti-nuke") rhetoric and propaganda. A hypermodern Russian ICBM, surpassing in capability even the best ones deployed by the U.S., introduces a new form, a new dimension, of completely unnecessary overkill into the old "Dr. Strangelove" equation.
There seems only one explanation: Putin is eager to restore his Motherland to the posture of an armed camp, thus strengthening his grip and regaining superpower prestige, and maybe even escalate a new thermonuclear arms race, regardless of the price tag and effect on the living standard of his people. Yet those same patriotic people, suffering terrible unemployment and starvation during the experiment with capitalism that failed in the 1990s, welcome their newest strongman so long as he puts at least some bread back on their table; MP3 players and designer jeans they can do without, and they know it. This sounds awfully similar to what went on at the height of the Cold War. But decades back, Russia hadn't discovered and started to tap its immense Siberian oil and natural gas reserves, which threaten to provide more-than-ample sustained financing for Putin's buildup.
If it's true that a Second Cold War is starting, it's sad to watch the Kremlin failing the world. While America and our Allies are working our hearts out and spilling our blood to help spread freedom internationally, autocrats and oligarchs in Moscow set an appalling example by throwing Russia hard into reverse.
Email
this page to friends
© 2004 Joe Buff. All opinions expressed
in this article are the author's and do not necessarily reflect
those of Military.com.
|