Home
Benefits
News
entertainment
shop
finance
careers
education
join military
community
  
 

Allan Topol: Turkey on the Edge
Allan Topol: Turkey on the Edge

 


About Allan Topol


Allan Topol is a partner in a large Washington-based international law firm. He has a science and engineering degree from Carnegie Mellon, and a law degree from Yale University. For almost 40 years, he has been involved in issues at the height of the Washington power structure.

He is also a national bestselling novelist, using the thriller genre to explore international geopolitical and military issues. His 2001 novel, SPY DANCE, is about a former CIA agent on the run and Saudi Arabian oil. His 2003 novel, DARK AMBITION, deals with the corruption of power in Washington and China's threatening posture toward Taiwan. In January 2004, his new novel CONSPIRACY was released dealing with a foreign leader's attempt to influence an American presidential election and the possibility of renewed militarism in Japan.

Allan Topol contact info:
Allan Topol Website
Email Allan Topol

Allan Topol Books:
Spy Dance
Dark Ambition
Conspiracy

Allan Topol Archives


Military Opinions Index

Discussion Board
Have an opinion on this article? Sound off.

September 21, 2004

[Have an opinion about the issues discussed in this column? Sound off here.]

In another week the European Commission will publish its recommendation to the EU on Turkey's application for membership. If the recommendation is in the affirmative, then EU leaders must decide at a December summit meeting whether they agree or not. Protracted negotiations on the conditions for membership, which might take years, would then commence. If the decision is negative, Turkey will be barred from membership.

The stakes are enormous. Not just for Turkey and the EU, but for the United States and the Middle East as well.

For Turkey, which has been a long time NATO member, joining the EU is a way to strengthen the country's economy and raise the standard of living of the people. It is also a matter of great prestige -- demonstrating that Turkey is a part of the new Europe. Turkey's admission to the EU would logically follow the recent entry of Eastern European nations.

Many in Western Europe ("the old Europe") are strongly opposed to Turkey's membership. In public discussions, they point to size for starters. With seventy-one million people, Turkey is already larger in population than any EU country other than Germany, and is likely to overtake Germany in fifteen years. With voting in the EU Parliament based on population, Turkey would then have the largest national block. On the other hand, it will only have fifteen percent of the total and hardly be able to control decisions.

Poverty is the next objection being publicly raised. Turkey's per capita income is far below other members. The risk that poor Turks might migrate west in search of already scarce jobs in Western Europe is causing anxiety among many European leaders. Already, Interior Ministers are worried what they will do about the hordes of jobless they are anticipating from Eastern Europe.

Some of those opposed argue that Turkey is not even in Europe. It is in Asia. This point is absurd. Most of Cypress, which has recently joined, is east of Ankara, Turkey's capital. Unquestionably, Turkey's biggest city, Istanbul, lies on the European continent. Besides, the EU already decided this issue in Turkey's favor a number of years ago.

Brushing those arguments aside, we come to the one whispered, about the fact that "Turkey is a Muslim country." Many in the old Europe view the EU as a Christian Club. At present, approximately twelve million EU citizens are Muslim, but those people reside in Christian dominated nations. Turkey is different. The country is almost all Muslim.

For decades, the Turkish government has been fiercely secular and has a strict separation of church and state. This should satisfy the Europeans who claim that religious freedom is the only relevant criteria. Turkey, like France, forbids the wearing of head coverings in public schools, to the dismay of Muslims. But bigotry against Islam runs strong in Europe these days.

Offsetting these anti-Turkish pressures are military considerations. We can expect European Defense Industries to be supportive of Turkey's application for EU membership.

The Turkish military is a large arms purchaser, and EDI has the ability to put pressure on the relevant decision makers. Turkey will be a valuable asset to the extent that the EU moves toward a more integrated military in the future, The Turkish situation on this issue is not helped by the fact that the current head of the Turkish government, Erdogan, is from a party with Islamic roots. He has tried to cut back the power of the military, which has been a force for secularism. His government planned to criminalize adultery, but when it was clear that would cost Turkey any chance at EU membership, Erdogan promptly reversed course.

On the other hand, the EU admitted Ireland in the 1970s when the Catholic Church controlled much of Irish public life. What the issue comes down to is whether Europeans will equate Islam with terrorism and support for Osma Bin Laden.



Here's where the United States has a lot on the line. Turkey is precisely the type of liberal democracy that Bush in trying to foster in the Muslim Middle East. If the EU votes "no," this will confirm the view of hardliners in the Muslim world that a war is being waged by Christians against Islam. Conversely, a "yes" vote means that freedom and democracy are rewarded and have tangible benefits.

On top of all that, despite differences with Ankara at the beginning of the second Iraqi war, the U.S. needs Turkey as a staunch ally for its Middle Eastern battles against terrorism. I worry that with Erdogan's Islamic party in control, Turkey may become less secular, particularly if the power of its army diminishes. EU membership could be a way of halting this dangerous slide.

Conversely, if Turkey is spurned by Europe, it may lead to a more intense reversion toward an Islamic state. Turkey might then turn against the U.S. as well and look eastward. The adverse consequences for American foreign policy will be severe.

We're in a familiar situation. The Europeans will do what they want. We'll have to live with the consequences. Let's hope they vote yes.


© 2004 Allan Topol. All opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of Military.com.


 



 



Military Opinions Index


Member Center


FREE Newsletter


Military Report


Equipment Guides


Installation Guides


Military History