Home
Benefits
News
entertainment
shop
finance
careers
education
join military
community
 
Search for Military News:  
Headlines News Home | Video News | Early Brief | Forum | Passdown | Discussions | Benefit Updates | Defense Tech
9/11 Panel Seeks Pentagon Support
Associated Press
August 11, 2004

WASHINGTON - Senior Defense Department officials joined skeptical House members Tuesday in questioning whether an all-powerful, Washington-based national intelligence director could hinder a special forces captain on a distant battlefield.

Leaders of the Sept. 11 commission told a House hearing their proposal wasn't designed to prevent up-to-the-minute information from reaching a combat zone. Chairman Thomas Kean and Vice Chairman Lee Hamilton said the panel was instead trying to ensure the 15 intelligence agencies cooperate, something they failed to do before the 2001 attacks.

Gen. Bryan Brown, the military's Special Operations commander, told the Armed Services Committee he wants information "instantly available to my guy on the ground or my guy in the air. I would not want any impediment," he said.

"Done wrong, it will horde everything into Washington ... and that would be a mistake," said Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz.

The hearing was the first chance for top Pentagon officials to testify extensively on recommendations by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, commonly called the 9-11 commission.

Wolfowitz, Brown and Gen. Peter Pace, vice chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said their caution did not mean they opposed commission proposals for the new office and a central depository for intelligence.

Some committee members were just as skeptical, indicating some lawmakers have problems with the Sept. 11 panel's recommendations.

"I don't see any specific mention of failure on the part of a DOD (Department of Defense) agency," said Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., chairman of the Armed Services panel.

Kean and Hamilton have been lobbying Congress to pass the terror-fighting recommendations in their 567-page report, saying the need is urgent. They testified the same day President Bush announced he was nominating House Intelligence Committee Chairman Porter Goss, R-Fla., as CIA director.

Members of both parties returned from their August recess to attend the hearing. Before the session, Democrats met behind closed doors with Kean and Hamilton. And House Democratic leaders later held a news conference to urge Congress to return this month to overhaul the intelligence system.

At the hearing, Rep. Jim Cooper, D-Tenn., sharply asked Wolfowitz whether the Pentagon was engaged in "sweet talking and slow walking" to thwart the commission's recommendations.

Wolfowitz denied it, saying the commission "correctly identified important areas where we can do a lot better" and Pentagon lawyers were working on the recommendations.

Kean, a Republican, and Hamilton, a Democrat, told Hunter they had no specific example of a military intelligence failure, but said the nation's pressing problem was the lack of coordination that prevented agencies from connecting pre-Sept. 11 information.

When then-CIA Director George Tenet declared a war on terrorism prior to the Sept. 11 attacks, Kean said, "Nobody got it in other agencies. It was like he never said it."

Hunter recalled the image of a special forces soldier in Afghanistan who was sitting on a horse, possessing up-to-date intelligence through satellite communications. The military shouldn't have to borrow the satellite from a national intelligence office, he said.

"We did not intend to make any recommendation that would adversely impact the warfighter," Hamilton responded. The commission leaders said their proposal for a national director would protect the military by having a top Pentagon official serve as a deputy to the new official.

Rep. Curt Weldon, R-Pa., said the commission's toughest opposition will come from the intelligence agencies that would lose some of their power, saying, "The problem is the arrogance of the entrenched agency bureaucracy."

Kean responded, "We were told by a number of wise heads around this town that these (recommendations) are hard; people before you tried.... and failed. This may be our generation's chance because of the timing," he said in reference to the nation's readiness to respond to the terrorism threat.

Acknowledging skepticism about changing the military intelligence structure, the two leaders said in a joint statement that the secretary of defense should be permitted to change a military operation he opposed.

"Or, the head of the NCTC (National Counterterrorism Center) would have to bump this issue up to the National Security Council and the president for resolution," they added.

Sound Off...What do you think? Join the discussion.


Copyright 2004 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Sound Off...What do you think? Join the discussion.

Copyright 2012 . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


 


Search for Military News: