Home
Benefits
News
entertainment
shop
finance
careers
education
join military
community
  
 

Secrecy News: School Secrets
Secrecy News: School Secrets

 
About Secrecy News

SECRECY NEWS is an email publication of the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) Project on Government Secrecy. It provides informal coverage of new developments in secrecy, security and intelligence policies, as well as links to new acquisitions on the Federation of American Scientists web site. It is published 2 to 3 times a week, or as events warrant.

Secrecy News Article Index

Military Opinions

Visit the Secrecy News Website

Sound Off! - Have an opinion about this column? Visit the Secrecy News discussion forum.


April 23, 2004


[Have an opinion about this column? Visit the Secrecy News discussion forum.]


SECRECY SPREADS IN ACADEMIC SCIENCE

Restrictions on the publication of unclassified scientific research and on the participation of foreign nationals in such research are documented in a new study from the Association of American Universities.

"Over the past three years, universities across the country have reported a significant increase of situations where a sponsor has included... language that either restricts the dissemination of research results or the use of foreign nationals without prior approval on certain research projects," the report states.

The authors analyzed 138 instances of such restrictions, mostly imposed by Defense Department funders.

"The most disturbing outcome revealed by the data is the substantial negative impact on the conduct of basic and applied research of value to the nation which normally takes place in institutions of higher education in the United States."

In the best case, such restrictions typically cause delay in the negotiation of contract agreements. In the worst case, they drive scientists away from investigation of contentious topics, the authors found.

"Faculty and researchers are often forced to turn their attention and talents toward research projects that do not involve these difficulties," according to the study.

The authors said that such restrictions run contrary to the policy enunciated in the 1985 National Security Decision Directive 189, which directed that unclassified research should remain unrestricted.



See "Restrictions on Research Awards: Troublesome Clauses," report of a task force of the Association of American Universities and the Council on Governmental Relations, transmitted April 8, 2004.

The new study was described in "Reports Examine Academe's Role in Keeping Secrets" by David Malakoff, Science Magazine, April 23.

Meanwhile, however, a report from the Defense Department Inspector General (also noted by Malakoff) found that "one university granted foreign nationals access to unclassified export-controlled technology without proper authorization."

"Unauthorized access to unclassified export-controlled technology could allow foreign nations to counter or reproduce the technology and thus reduce the effectiveness of the technology, significantly alter program direction, or degrade combat effectiveness," the Inspector General warned.

See "Export-Controlled Technology at Contractor, University, and Federally Funded Research and Development Center Facilities," DoD Inspector General, March 25, 2004.

Two recently updated Congressional Research Service reports address related issues of controlling scientific information.

"Balancing Scientific Publication and National Security Concerns: Issues for Congress," by Dana A. Shea, updated February 2, 2004.

"'Sensitive But Unclassified' and Other Federal Security Controls on Scientific and Technical Information: History and Current Controversy," by Genevieve J. Knezo, udpated February 20, 2004.

THE SARS OUTBREAK IN CANADA REVISITED

The outbreak of the SARS virus in Ontario, Canada in spring of 2003 caught the Canadian public health system unprepared and ill-equipped to respond. An official Canadian Commission report dissects the failures and proposes remedial measures.

"The report is unflattering," a email correspondent wrote to Secrecy News, "but it is an exceptionally good assessment of a public health infrastructure under duress."

"You could swap certain words, like 'U.S.' for 'Ontario' or 'anthrax' for 'SARS,' and it would be a familiar story in some ways."

On the other hand, the Canadian report does not include an analysis of "the intersections of law enforcement and public health that are important for a competent bioterrorism response. We can only learn so much about intentional events by studying unintentional ones."

See the SARS Commission Interim Report "SARS and Public Health in Ontario," April 15, 2004 (230 pages, 925 KB PDF file).

DEA VIEWS CHINA AND DRUGS

The role of China in illicit drug trafficking is assessed in a recent "drug intelligence brief" from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.

"China is a major source of precursor chemicals necessary for the production of cocaine, heroin, and crystal methamphetamine," the DEA brief said.

"Although China has taken aggressive actions through legislation and regulation of production and exportation of precursor chemicals, extensive action is required to control the illicit diversion and smuggling of precursor chemicals."

See "China: Country Brief," Drug Enforcement Agency, February 2004 (650 KB PDF file).

© 2004, Federation of American Scientists. All opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of Military.com.


 
 
 



 



Member Center


FREE Newsletter


Military Report


Equipment Guides


Installation Guides


Military History