Home
Benefits
News
entertainment
shop
finance
careers
education
join military
community
  
 

U.S., S. Korea Meeting to Discuss Military Burden-Sharing Agreement
 

Stars & Stripes

This article is provided courtesy of Stars & Stripes, which got its start as a newspaper for Union troops during the Civil War, and has been published continuously since 1942 in Europe and 1945 in the Pacific. Stripes reporters have been in the field with American soldiers, sailors and airmen in World War II, Korea, the Cold War, Vietnam, the Gulf War, Bosnia and Kosovo, and are now on assignment in the Middle East.

Stars and Stripes has one of the widest distribution ranges of any newspaper in the world. Between the Pacific and European editions, Stars & Stripes services over 50 countries where there are bases, posts, service members, ships, or embassies.

Related Links:

Current Archive


Stars & Stripes Website

Sound off in our Discussion Boards
Have an opinion on the issues discussed in this article? Sound off.

Get Breaking Military News Alerts



Related Links

 

Installation Guides

Featured Articles

 


Get Over $1000 a Month!

Your service may have earned you great education benefits. Get over $1000 per month to pay for your undergraduate, graduate or technical degree.

Find military-friendly schools today
.

November 2, 2004

[Have an opinion about the issues discussed in this article? Sound off in our Discussion Boards.]

By Joseph Giordono,
Stars and Stripes Pacific Edition

YONGSAN GARRISON, South Korea — South Korean and U.S. teams are meeting in Washington, D.C., this week to discuss the military burden-sharing agreement between the two nations, with Seoul saying its annual contribution to the upkeep of the U.S. military and its installations is too high.

The delegations were to have met Monday and Tuesday in Washington, officials said, with the focus being a 1990 agreement requiring South Korea to contribute an amount that fluctuates yearly.

According to a Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokesman, the delegation is asking to reduce its 2005 contribution because of U.S. plans to reduce the number of troops it has stationed here. Under an agreement finalized last month, the United States will remove 12,500 troops from South Korea over the next three years.

The first 5,000 of those troops — which are to include the 2nd Brigade Combat Team soldiers deployed from South Korea to Iraq — will be gone by the end of this year.

To that end, the Foreign Ministry said, the South Korean government should pay less than the $623 million it contributed this year for the burden-sharing agreement.

The amount contributed by the South Koreans is negotiated each year; the Foreign Ministry said it would like to wrap up this year’s negotiations by the end of December.

South Korea’s share in funding the U.S. military, especially the U.S. transformation plans, has become an issue here. Some Korean politicians also are upset about an agreement that requires Seoul to pay virtually all of the cost to move Yongsan Garrison and other U.S. bases under a plan to consolidate U.S. bases into hubs outside of the capital.

The South Korean National Assembly last month estimated the total cost of the moves at $4.9 billion.

Last week in Seoul, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell said issues such as funding the Yongsan Garrison move would be addressed.

During a news conference at the Foreign Ministry, Powell acknowledged the Yongsan move would have “political and economic costs” for South Korea’s capital city. He emphasized that those concerns will be addressed in future negotiations between South Korea and the United States as they determine the costs each country must shoulder.

“We will have to spend a great deal of time in consultation with each other,” Powell said about Special Measures Agreement talks, which involve setting those costs. “We will have to examine the SMA and renegotiate it. We look forward to that.”

Email this page to friends

©2004 Stars & Stripes. All opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of Military.com.

 
 



 



Member Center


FREE Newsletter


Military Report


Equipment Guides


Installation Guides


Military History