This article is provided
courtesy of Stars & Stripes, which
got its start as a newspaper for Union troops
during the Civil War, and has been published
continuously since 1942 in Europe and 1945
in the Pacific. Stripes reporters have
been in the field with American soldiers,
sailors and airmen in World War II, Korea,
the Cold War, Vietnam, the Gulf War, Bosnia
and Kosovo, and are now on assignment in the
Middle East.
Stars and Stripes has one of the widest distribution
ranges of any newspaper in the world. Between
the Pacific and European editions, Stars
& Stripes services over 50 countries
where there are bases, posts, service members,
ships, or embassies.
Related Links:
Current
Archive
Stars
& Stripes Website
Sound
off in our Discussion Boards
Have an opinion on the issues discussed in
this article? Sound off.
Get
Breaking Military News Alerts
|
|
|
|
October 11, 2004
[Have an opinion about the issues discussed in this article?
Sound
off in our Discussion Boards.]
By Ward Sanderson,
Stars and Stripes European Edition
BAGHDAD — American officials say the U.S. Project and Contracting
Office is completing renovations on about 200 schools, and it soon
plans to begin work on 1,000 more.
They also say the work is being done without swarms of subcontractors
— who the Iraqi government claims have contributed to shoddy work
in the past.
And it’s all working with a minimum investment in security, thanks
to low-profile operations.
So far, work has focused on the southern part of the country, but
will soon move north. The entire project will cost $79 million,
or about $35,000 to $65,000 per school.
A senior U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said
that Iraq’s Ministry of Education and local headmasters decide what
the schools need, and the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers signs off on the quality of the completed work
before contractors are paid. Iraqis are doing the on-site work so
as not to attract attention, saving money on security costs.
Still, these Iraqis won’t be hiring other Iraqi companies, who
in turn hire yet others.
“The one thing we focused on is making sure there were not a lot
of layers of subcontractors,” the U.S. official said during a background
briefing Sunday.
Large companies and organizations remain involved at the top level.
Work is being managed by groups including KBR, an affiliate of Halliburton,
the corporation formerly headed by Vice President Dick Cheney; Washington
Group International; U.S. Agency for International Development;
and Save the Children.
The oversight and subsequent desire to minimize subcontracting
follows complaints by Iraq’s Ministry of Education over previous
renovations by both nongovernmental organizations and large firms,
in particular the Bechtel Corp.
A second official, a U.S. consultant involved in the renovations,
said some charities abandoned work once Iraq
become more dangerous in March. Iraq’s criticism of Bechtel has
been more generally aimed at the quality of work done.
Bechtel has released a statement defending its work in Iraq.
“A number of inaccurate and misleading statements have been made
recently regarding Bechtel’s work under the U.S. Agency for International
Development (USAID) in Iraq, suggesting that Bechtel has won sweetheart
deals, overcharged the federal government, and failed to employ
Iraqis,” its release read. “These charges simply are not true. …
Bechtel stands proud of the contribution the men and women on the
project are making to this critical postwar effort.”
U.S. officials said Sunday that Bechtel did “a lot” of good work,
but acknowledged that the Iraqi government had complained.
In addition to the U.S. Project and Contracting Office efforts,
charities continue to help build the schools — so much so, in fact,
that the office has found 600 of the 1,200 schools it originally
planned to renovate had already been improved. The Americans are
then using their resources to find finding additional schools to
work on.
U.S. officials said they are happy for the help, but would like
to see a central database so that they know who is doing what work.
“It’s a tough one,” the consultant said, “because there’s no central
point of control … some NGOs just don’t want to deal with the U.S.
government.”
Email
this page to friends
©2004 Stars & Stripes. All opinions
expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily
reflect those of Military.com.
|