Home
Benefits
News
entertainment
shop
finance
careers
education
join military
community
  
 

It Wasn't About the Curfew After All
It Wasn't About the Curfew After All
 

DefenseWatch

This article is provided courtesy of DefenseWatch, the official magazine for Soldiers For The Truth (SFTT), a grass-roots educational organization started by a small group of concerned veterans and citizens to inform the public, the Congress, and the media on the decline in readiness of our armed forces. Inspired by the outspoken idealism of retired Colonel David Hackworth, SFTT aims to give our service people, veterans, and retirees a clear voice with the media, Congress, the public and their services.



Related Links

DefenseWatch Website

Article Archive

Hot Discussions

Have an opinion on this commentary? Sound off.

Get Breaking Military News Alerts

An Insider's Guide to Joining the Military


March 8, 2005


[Have an opinion about the views expressed in this article? Sound off in the Hot Issues with Defensewatch Forum.]

By Nathaniel R. Helms


The war of words between civilian contractors and military authorities tearing apart the Land of the Morning Calm continues to wail despite a major concession by United States Forces Korea (USFK) Commander Gen. Leon J. LaPorte to rescind his inflammatory order that slapped a curfew on Department of Defense civilian contractors and dependents subject to USFK authority.

On Monday, DefenseWatch reported that a serious conflict had erupted in South Korea over American civilians unfettered right to Korean poontang ("Making Korea a Nooky-Free Zone,"). Since our earlier report, dramatic new events have taken place that bring our original focus into question. On Tuesday, USFK announced that a modified order issued that day effective at 1 p.m. local time "removes civilians, including DoD civilians, DoD invited contractors and SOFA-status family members, from mandatory compliance, although they are still highly encouraged to adhere to the curfew hours." Whoopee!

The order also amended service members' off-installation curfew to allow them to be out until 1 a.m. instead of midnight on Friday, Saturday and holidays, "including U.S. national holidays, USFK training holidays, and U.S.-observed ROK holidays," the new order said. It did not, however, lift any restrictions on service members seeking solace in South Korea's bawdy houses.

There was no mention of milk and cookies for everyone who is being good.

The long-simmering feud between the Calvinistic-preaching LaPorte and the DoD civilians erupted into internecine warfare just before Christmas after the general issued his unpopular dictate in the name of preventing "human trafficking" and "force protection, safety, good order, discipline, and optimum readiness." His target was the DoD civilians who sought the services of South Korea's ubiquitous whorehouses in defiance of LaPorte's standing orders that made both the whores and whoring in general off-limits to American soldiers and civilians under his authority anywhere in Korea. Suddenly celebrating civilians found themselves in the same fix as Cinderella except they had to stay home until 5 a.m. unless they were on official business.

Instead of deploying Cinderella's wicked sisters to turn the offenders' coaches into pumpkins and their mousy Korean bimbos into the pestilent rodents LaPorte declared them to be, the general sallied forth with his military police armed with unfamiliar (and some would argue unconstitutional) martial authority to arrest all the DoD civilians they discovered in violation of the military curfew. The enraged civilians retaliated by creating a Website called "Free Fed" and starting a letter-writing campaign to the news media and Congress declaring LaPorte the "Wicked Witch of the South."

Last fall, LaPorte testified before the House Armed Services Committee that in the name of human rights, freedom and democracy, he was prepared to make a clean sweep of the whores, harlots, pimps and human traffickers that abound in South Korea. The FreeFed manifesto demands that he be sent home on the broom he flew in on.

It may sound like a fairy tale in what is supposed to be a lean, mean fighting force defending our Asian flank, but the burgeoning crisis growing inside the essential American command in South Korea is very real.

The 5,000 or so civilians supporting the already hamstrung force on the tense peninsula are the same folks who are supposed to be protecting our vital interests in a region where a nuclear nutcase runs around deflowering young virgins while he accumulates atomic weapons to threaten the fragile peace on the entire region. In that context, it suddenly turns from a fairy tale to a saga of terrifying consequences if war was suddenly to erupt where only an armistice holds together a tenuous peace.

LaPorte's spin doctors explained the apparently routine shift in policy in a Tuesday press release provided to DefenseWatch by Air Force Maj. Edwina M. Walton, the Chief of Strategic Communications and Policy for all American forces in Korea. The soft-pedaling tap-dance the PAOs choreographed spends two entire pages explaining that the seemingly sudden turnaround in official policy was merely part of a continuous assessment process by Gen. LaPorte's people that reflects "the latest readiness and force protection assessments, analysis of general and specific threats, inputs from a variety of expert and leadership advisors, and consideration of numerous other factors such as quality of life impact for all SOFA-status personnel."

Whew!

On March 8, along with Adm. William J. Fallon, Commander, U.S. Pacific Command, LaPorte is scheduled to testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee chaired by powerful Virginia Republican John Warner about troop readiness in Korea. The civilians up in arms over LaPorte's high-handedness have mounted a letter-writing campaign to every member of the Senate Armed force Committee demanding LaPorte be held accountable for being so darn mean to them. That may explain why LaPorte's decision to modify his Draconian order was made because the command "weighed concerns over quality of life issues regarding mandatory compliance with the curfew for all civilians," as the press release put it.

Currently on the civilians FreeFed web site bulletin board, contributors are burning up the nether proclaiming a limited victory and demanding LaPorte's head just the same.

"Searching4Justice" trumpeted, "This is definitely not over … WRITE THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE NOW. Don't wait till after they meet and he sticks it to you again. Then will be too late. Oh, and you might focus some on how the Tyrannical Policies and Martial Law have destroyed USFK morale and readiness across the board."

The "Tyrannical Policies and martial Law" bit was in red text, apparently for emphasis in case the reader had missed Searching4Justice's big point.

Somebody calling himself "STRIKE EAGLE," proclaimed, "The Commander would never have voluntarily agreed to change the curfew policy, on which he had staked much of his credibility. The real reasons causing the civilian curfew's discontinuance included the gigantic financial liability for civil service standby pay to which the command exposed itself, the near mutinous public reaction to the command's policies and arrogant justification thereof, and political pressure emanating from USPACOM and Washington, D.C."

It would seem that every civilian in Korean put in his or her two cents' worth on the "Free Fed" website's bulletin board. Despite the obvious and vocal disdain for LaPorte and his puritanical policies, the Pacific Stars & Stripes reported, "USFK's public affairs office said the [civilian] complaints were not a factor in changing the policy."

So what is it really about? In Tuesday's edition of Stars & Stripes, it was reported that nine U.S. Army Corps of Engineers workers submitted a written request to USFK last Monday explaining that each employee was seeking an average of "800 hours in back pay" as compensation for complying with a military curfew since it was first announced last September, according to the union president representing the group. The Army has until March 14 to respond or else some unspecified event will occur, the report said. Perhaps the employees will turn into pumpkins.

That was also the first clue that DefenseWatch had missed the boat!

The workers told Stars & Stripes reporter Teri Weaver that they were demanding the back pay for contractually specified "standby duty in return for staying home during the nightly curfew policy imposed for civilian workers since September." Their demand begs the question of when were these guys going to get some sleep. Apparently these civilians are iron men and women capable of carousing all night and working all day. Perhaps LaPorte will mention that gratifying discovery during his testimony before Congress. It would certainly be good news amongst all the bad stuff he will be forced to reveal.

Corps of Engineers union president Jeffrey Meadows reportedly sent a one-page letter to Army officials in Seoul as the first step in filing a formal grievance to obtain the money. Meadows told Stars & Stripes that he and other union members first thought of the idea as a way to push USFK leaders into easing or eliminating the curfew.

"Well, that was our goal a month ago," he is quoted as saying. "But now our focus is the money."

Isn't that just dandy! It isn't about poontang after all.

LaPorte will be ecstatic to learn that. It is really about money and greed! What a sad commentary on the state of affairs in our bastion in the Pacific. Maybe we should all wish for the Magic Princess to appear and sprinkle some happy dust around. What is currently happening in South Korea sounds like a sad, sad fairy tale desperately in need of a happy ending.


©2005 DefenseWatch. Contributing Editor Nathaniel R. "Nat" Helms is a Vietnam veteran, former police officer, long-time journalist and war correspondent living in Missouri. He is the author of two books, Numba One - Numba Ten and Journey Into Madness: A Hitchhiker's Account of the Bosnian Civil War, both available at www.ebooks-online.com. He can be reached at natshouse1@charter.net. All opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of Military.com.

 



 



Member Center


FREE Newsletter


Military Report


Equipment Guides


Installation Guides


Military History